Austria’s online gambling regime is approaching an inflection point. The Austrian Association for Betting and Gambling (OVWG) has renewed calls for policymakers to move beyond the current state-monopoly model toward a licensing framework, highlighting both market readiness and the potential for stronger consumer protections. With Finland beginning its transition away from monopoly from 2026 and many legal briefings pointing to full licensing by 2027, Austria and Poland would remain the last European jurisdictions with strict state control over online casino unless Vienna advances reforms.

Parties Set the Table for Federal-Level Talks

According to SBC News, the OVWG indicates that federal discussions on gambling reform are expected to start soon, with the aim of reaching a political agreement by year’s end. It points to a cross-party dialogue among the Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP), the Social Democratic Party (SPÖ), and NEOS (The New Austria and Liberal Forum). Separately, industry reporting also frames an agreement timeline running to the end of 2025, underscoring that the window for decision-making is narrow but actionable. The trade body’s signaling is unambiguous: momentum exists, expectations are calibrated to near-term action, and the preference is for licensing—even if via a limited-licence model as a first step.

According to the OVWG’s analysis, Austria’s market could support immediate entry by roughly 20–30 companies once rules are set. Among prospective early movers are brands long familiar to local bettors via sports wagering, including Tipico and Entain’s Bwin; other major international operators such as bet365, LeoVegas, Merkur, and Betway are similarly positioned. The association emphasizes two core benefits of licensing: clear gains in player protection through proven international standards, and a significantly larger tax base. Forecasts cited by the OVWG suggest that a licensed market could generate around €1.4 billion in tax receipts by 2031—“many times higher” than the current monopoly-era take.

The association also argues that a controlled licensing environment would better channel players into regulated offerings, though it acknowledges the complexities of such comparisons by noting Germany’s ongoing struggle with black-market activity. Even with that caveat, OVWG maintains that liberalised European markets tend to yield stronger compliance and more robust responsible-gambling frameworks.

Regional Alignment and Implementation Options

Signals from regional forums support the sense that Austria is preparing for a more assertive oversight posture. Austrian representatives have engaged with peers in the DACHL context—hosted by Germany’s Gemeinsame Glücksspielbehörde der Länder (GGL) in Halle—on enforcement tactics such as IP blocking and cross-border coordination against unlicensed operators. At home, policymakers are weighing structural choices: a fully open regime versus a limited number of licences or a phased path away from state exclusivity. Industry voices have been clear that even a capped licensing round would mark meaningful progress toward a modernised regime aligned with European practice.

Looking ahead, the calendar adds urgency. As the Casinos Austria exclusivity horizon near 2027 draws closer, the costs of inaction rise—both in terms of potential tax foregone and continued channelisation toward offshore sites. Estimates place Austria’s online gambling revenue near €632 million in 2024 (roughly a fifth of total gambling revenue), a base that could expand materially under a well-regulated, competitive model.

Confidence levels within the sector are high. OVWG members stress that the legal and operational groundwork is largely in place; what’s needed is the political green light. The association’s messaging is consistent: continuing a full state monopoly should be ruled out; if lawmakers prefer a cautious approach, a limited-licence framework would still deliver concrete gains in transparency, revenue, and player protection. With Finland’s transition underway from 2026 toward full licensing by 2027, Austria faces a straightforward choice—remain an outlier or converge with the European norm.

For now, the cue is with federal negotiators. Should talks among ÖVP, SPÖ, and NEOS coalesce into an agreement in late 2025, Austria could set in motion a licensing pathway that both addresses consumer-protection goals and captures the fiscal upside that OVWG projects. As the trade body summed up in its broader analysis of the opportunity, excitement is high and “anything is possible.”