A majority of Thai citizens are voicing apprehension over the government’s proposal to establish entertainment complexes that would include casinos, according to a recent survey conducted by the National Institute of Development Administration (Nida Poll). The study, conducted from March 18-20 among 1,310 respondents nationwide and cited by Bangkok Post, revealed widespread concern regarding the policy’s potential social, economic, and political ramifications.

The initiative, which aims to bolster tourism, attract foreign investment, and stimulate economic growth, has faced significant skepticism. While proponents argue that regulated casinos could generate substantial revenue, many fear that such establishments could increase crime, gambling addiction, and political corruption.

Primary Concerns: Social and Economic Risks

Among the survey respondents, the most pressing issue, cited by 32.6%, was whether the policy would foster a culture of vice and pose risks to national security. Following closely, 30.23% questioned the actual economic benefits, doubting whether the government’s claims of financial growth would materialize. Additionally, 28.09% of participants were concerned about gambling addiction and what preventive measures would be implemented.

Further concerns included potential money laundering (24.89%) and the possibility of these casino-entertainment complexes becoming a hub for criminal activities (24.66%). Some respondents (20.15%) sought clarity on how the government would mitigate social consequences, while others questioned whether the policy would effectively combat illegal gambling (18.63%) or genuinely increase tourism (18.55%).

Many also expressed apprehension about potential political ramifications, with 16.56% worrying that casino operations might serve as a financial resource for politicians. Transparency was another key issue—12.14% of those surveyed questioned how licensing could be safeguarded against corruption, and 11.98% were dissatisfied with the government’s decision not to hold a public referendum on the matter.

Potential for Conflict and Political Disputes

The survey also assessed whether the proposed policy could lead to social and political discord. About 31.83% of respondents predicted that the policy could trigger serious conflict, while another 31.68% believed it would cause disagreement but not necessarily escalate into violence. Meanwhile, 26.49% suggested that the differing views on the matter would remain at the level of debate rather than lead to major disputes.

Despite these concerns, the Thai government has defended its position, asserting that the entertainment complex initiative is necessary to revitalize the economy and strengthen the country’s tourism sector. However, public skepticism remains high, particularly as the Cabinet recently decided to delay the bill’s final deliberation to allow for further review and consultation.

Casino Operators Express Interest Amid Policy Uncertainty

Despite opposition, the proposal has garnered attention from major investors. Galaxy Entertainment Group, a Macau-based casino operator, has expressed interest in investing billions of dollars in the potential Bangkok complex. Kevin Clayton, the company’s chief brand officer, noted that Thailand’s tourism sector has been recovering steadily and could benefit from significant investment in entertainment infrastructure.

Clayton acknowledged public concerns, particularly regarding gambling addiction and crime, but emphasized that a well-regulated industry could provide responsible gambling measures, anti-money laundering safeguards, and consumer protections. He argued that an underground gambling economy already exists in Thailand, and legalizing the industry within controlled environments could offer a safer alternative.

Calls for Greater Transparency and Public Involvement

The government’s reluctance to hold a public referendum on the issue has sparked further criticism. A segment of respondents (10.15%) questioned whether the feasibility of the policy had been adequately studied, while 9.39% raised concerns about the transparency of the committee overseeing the policy’s development.

Additionally, some respondents wondered whether Thai citizens would be granted access to the casinos, what entry requirements would be imposed (5.73%), and how operators would ensure their businesses remained financially viable (4.50%). Others (3.51%) suggested that entertainment complexes could be developed without casinos altogether.

With public doubts persisting, policymakers face increasing pressure to address concerns surrounding crime, addiction, and corruption before moving forward with the legislation. While casino operators remain eager to invest, the Thai government must balance economic aspirations with public trust to ensure the success of its entertainment complex initiative.